Page 1 of 1

RED F - Active Safety Recommendation - Proposal

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2021 5:38 pm
by derpmann
Attached you find a first proposal for a new Related Electronic Document
summarizing the recommendation for Active Safety Tests.

Re: RED F - Active Safety Recommendation - Proposal

Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2021 12:41 pm
by derpmann
An updated version of the RED F proposal:

Re: RED F - Active Safety Recommendation - Proposal

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 9:46 am
by washausen
Hello,

here is an update of the proposal for RED F:
ISO_TS13499_RED_F_20220316.pdf
(195.53 KiB) Downloaded 1779 times

Kind regards,
Martin

Re: RED F - Active Safety Recommendation - Proposal

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2023 4:06 pm
by washausen
Hello,

here is an update of the proposal for RED F:
ISO_TS13499_RED_F_20231117.pdf
(1.8 MiB) Downloaded 1422 times
I have added the results from the following discussions to this document: Best regards,
Martin

Re: RED F - Active Safety Recommendation - Proposal

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2026 10:53 pm
by washausen
Hello,

please review this new draft of RED F:
ISO_TS13499_RED_F_20260711.docx
(2.96 MiB) Downloaded 38 times
This version contains all MME attributes which are required for Euro NCAP CA-004.

Topics for discussion are:
  • Shall tuples for a Shape contain all points from each side or is each point unique and can only be contained by one shape definition? (e.g.: is the left corner of the vehicle part of front shape and left side shape or only in one of theses shapes)?
  • Do we need additional attributes for given speeds in km/h or shall these only be added in for viability in "subtype of the test"
  • Is a detailed "Name of test object X" for targets necessary as this is given by the main location in ISO code (see "5.1.1.3 Main Locations for Vulnerable Road Users")
Kind regards,
Martin