RED F - Active Safety Recommendation - Proposal

[derpmann]

Attached you find a first proposal for a new Related Electronic Document
summarizing the recommendation for Active Safety Tests.

[derpmann]

An updated version of the RED F proposal:

[washausen]

Hello,

here is an update of the proposal for RED F:

ISO_TS13499_RED_F_20220316.pdf

(195.53 KiB) Downloaded 1735 times

Kind regards,
Martin

[washausen]

Hello,

here is an update of the proposal for RED F:

ISO_TS13499_RED_F_20231117.pdf

(1.8 MiB) Downloaded 1378 times

I have added the results from the following discussions to this document:

• Proposal for main locations of different targets

• Additional coordinate system for lateral and longitudinal distance

• Proposal on new main locations and fine locations

• Additional field descriptors in MME file for active safety

Best regards,
Martin

[washausen]

Hello,

please review this new draft of RED F:

ISO_TS13499_RED_F_20260711.docx

(2.96 MiB) Downloaded 12 times

This version contains all MME attributes which are required for Euro NCAP CA-004.

Topics for discussion are:

• Shall tuples for a Shape contain all points from each side or is each point unique and can only be contained by one shape definition? (e.g.: is the left corner of the vehicle part of front shape and left side shape or only in one of theses shapes)?

• Do we need additional attributes for given speeds in km/h or shall these only be added in for viability in "subtype of the test"

• Is a detailed "Name of test object X" for targets necessary as this is given by the main location in ISO code (see "5.1.1.3 Main Locations for Vulnerable Road Users")

Kind regards,
Martin